|
|
Post by Lukiedukie on Sept 17, 2004 19:43:50 GMT -5
I am wanting to buy another "pocket gun" and I have narrowed my choices down to another P3AT (my girlfriend is carrying the other one a bought) Now I am wondering if I should wait for another P3at or buy the PM9. Any ideas, opinions? Any one shot both?
|
|
|
|
Post by MLB on Sept 17, 2004 20:50:46 GMT -5
I'd go with the Kahr, but largely for varietys sake. Seems to me that buying two of the same gun denies you a bit of the enjoyment of a "new" gun.
From a practical standpoint though, another Kel-Tec would keep things consistent from a carry standpoint.
|
|
|
|
Post by TBT on Sept 18, 2004 6:57:14 GMT -5
I think the 9mm would be a better carry choice than the .380 so I would go with the Kahr. And as MLB stated, you would be robbing yourself of the "new gun" thing if you went with another P3AT.
|
|
|
|
Post by tptplayer on Sept 19, 2004 4:43:06 GMT -5
I don't have a Keltec and understand that they are good handguns for the money. However, the quality and dependability of Kahr is excellent. Also the availability and cost of 9mm is lower even though the round is noticebly more powerful.
|
|
|
|
Post by Lukiedukie on Sept 19, 2004 7:30:31 GMT -5
well I am going with the Pm9 with the brushed stainless slide. there is one place here that has one that I could even hold. Every one else is out of stock or has one in the warehouse. I have never seen suck a huge difference in prices for the same gun. One place wanted $499 another $589 a third $650. All the same model with out night sights.
Also I have deiced to pick up a wheel gun for my pocket gun. I was shown a smith sub 357 mag with a scandium frame that dropped right into the pocket if my shorts. That I got t shoot and I will say it was a blast to shoot. I do think I will get it ported.
So much for trying to stay with only three calibers of guns.I just want to give them all good homes. I must be the guns version of the ASPCA.
|
|
