|
Post by "DoubleAction" on Aug 28, 2009 2:06:53 GMT -5
Jeff Cooper's Commentaries Vol. 1, No. 1, June 1993 Lowering the hammer on the Sig Sauers
I have to stress that thumbing the hammer down on a Sig Sauer P- Series pistol disengages the incorporated safety lock work to the pistol, while allowing the hammer to rest on the firing pin. The decocker is not there to make life easier on your thumb; It's purpose is to safely lower the hammer, while disengaging the sear, and activating the firing pin safety block. Thumbing the hammer defeats this safety system.
|
|
|
Post by oldmanmontgomery on Oct 28, 2009 21:39:20 GMT -5
SIG Sauer P series. Solid engineering, solid manufacture. Rotten ergonomics for my somewhat smallish hands and I object to decocker devices on principle. I've seen too many people who disdain 'cocked and locked' carry, proceed to move with a cocked and unlocked pistol because the alternative was to lower the hammer and then fire the next shot double action again.
Not a bad pistol, but the controls don't cut it.
|
|
|
Post by Callahan on Oct 29, 2009 11:08:09 GMT -5
SIG Sauer P series. Solid engineering, solid manufacture. Rotten ergonomics for my somewhat smallish hands and I object to decocker devices on principle. I've seen too many people who disdain 'cocked and locked' carry, proceed to move with a cocked and unlocked pistol because the alternative was to lower the hammer and then fire the next shot double action again. Not a bad pistol, but the controls don't cut it. Welcome, OMM. Well, the controls don't cut it for you, at least. So, tell us a little bit about yourself, in as general terms as you like. What part of the country do you live in? Do you own firearms? If so, what make and models? Ever belonged to any other forums? You sound like you may be a 1911 and/or revolver man...
|
|
|
Post by "DoubleAction" on Oct 29, 2009 11:30:53 GMT -5
I've been fortunate to have these piano like fingers, which allows me to manipulate things, when working with my hands. The Decocker on the Sig was the first thing that I learned to understand about the pistol, and form a unconditional habit about it's intended purpose.
I don't know many people which don't understand about hammer safety, it's know wonder how the Colt Single Action Army made this far without having a safety bar incorporated into it's lock work.
|
|
|
Post by "DoubleAction" on May 27, 2014 17:46:24 GMT -5
..Manually Lowering The Hammers, on Pistols that Features "Decockers" :
.....The Sig's Decocker system not only lowers the hammer, it also safely disengages the sear and activates a hammer block, which prevents the hammer from coming to rest on the firing pin. Even so, the firing pin has a firing pin block on it as well ( Some refer to this firing pin safety as a Passive Firing Pin Safety ). Pressing the trigger to the rear, deactivates the Passive Firing Pin Safely.
....Manually lowering the hammer, by the thumb or finger, defeats the safety lock work in the trigger...... Lower the Hammer by the Decocker.
...Many cops had complaints about the Sig Sauer's Decockers, because the cops would form the habit of manually lowering the hammer before reholstering the pistols. This defeats the lockwork safety mechanisms on the Sig Sauers. So, Sig Sauer began producing Double Action Only triggers for the cops.
...I know that some will say that the first round would be double action, and after this, the following rounds would be fired on Single Action, and this would throw off the accuracy of the older Sigs.....Nope.....It was the trigger getting snagged on the holster, when the user failed to deploy the decocker lockwork.This is the reason why Sig Sauer began producing "Double Action Only" duty pistols for police.
|
|
|
Post by "DoubleAction" on Apr 11, 2016 12:46:06 GMT -5
..I brought this topic back up, to help answer this question : Why did Law Enforcement Quit Carrying Pistols with Hammers ?
...There are many reasons as to why many Law Enforcement Agencies Quit Issuing Duty Pistols with Hammers, This may be one.
|
|