Post by TMan on Oct 26, 2007 18:11:08 GMT -5
Edwards's Bid for Favor Of Hunters Draws Fire
A new attempt by a Democratic presidential hopeful, John Edwards, to cozy up to hunters is coming under fire from the National Rifle Association and conservation groups.
Traveling in Iowa yesterday, Mr. Edwards unveiled a "Hunting and Fishing Bill of Rights and Responsibilities" that calls for giving hunters more access to federal lands, including, in some cases, national parks.
"This is part of who I am and part of what I will stand for as president," Mr. Edwards told voters in Glenwood, Iowa, according to the Associated Press. He said he hunted while growing up in rural North Carolina and still fishes occasionally.
In a conference call with reporters, the former senator said the federal government could save millions of dollars by having private citizens thin wild herds instead of government-paid sharpshooters. "When national parks need to cull their game species because of overpopulation, I think they should look into having local hunters do the job," Mr. Edwards said, according to Radio Iowa. He also called for limits on oil drilling and logging on federal land, as well as a new national program to pay private landowners to open their property to sportsmen.
Asked for his opinion of the former senator's plan, the NRA's chief lobbyist, Chris Cox, replied: "Pathetic."
Mr. Cox said Mr. Edwards voted during his single Senate term for a measure to impose background checks at gun shows, for a ban on so-called assault weapons, and against a bill to protect gun makers from lawsuits. "Words on the campaign trail don't erase votes on the Senate floor. ... He's been on the wrong side at every opportunity," the lobbyist told The New York Sun.
Environmental groups said they supported parts of Mr. Edwards's plan but were concerned about language that seemed intended to give more weight to hunting interests in debates over land use.
"There are certainly some alarming aspects," the president of the Humane Society Legislative Fund, Michael Markarian, said. "National parks have historically been closed to sport hunting, and we believe that's a policy that should remain in place. … These are not national playgrounds. They're national parks."
The executive director of Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility, Jeff Ruch, called Mr. Edwards's plan "light years away" from the Bush administration's policies on some of the issues, but he said he was concerned that Mr. Edwards's plan would promote more use of snowmobiles and other off-road vehicles. "That's troublesome for a whole variety of reasons, including impact on wildlife," Mr. Ruch said. Mr. Ruch said there were similarities between Mr. Edwards's plan and an executive order Mr. Bush issued in August to promote hunting on federal lands. "What's similar … is the assumption that wildlife is there to provide hunting opportunities," Mr. Ruch said. "You're basically encouraging the propagation of trophy breeds at the expense of breeds that don't look as good on the wall."
While Republican presidential candidates have been actively jockeying for the votes of gun owners, the Democratic field has been all but silent on the issue, heeding the advice of political strategists who contend that persistent talk of gun control has hurt Democrats in recent elections. Until yesterday, only one Democrat, Governor Richardson of New Mexico, had sought to publicize his views on gun issues. Mr. Richardson has released photographs of trophies from his own hunts and has boasted about expanding hunting opportunities in New Mexico.
Candidates have been weighing in, deliberately or not, on a looming legal battle over the meaning of the constitutional right to bear arms. In March, a federal appeals court panel struck down a District of Columbia ban on handguns. The conservative court panel ruled, 2–1, that the Second Amendment creates an individual right to firearms, not merely the right to organize a militia.
The District of Columbia government has asked the Supreme Court to overturn that ruling.
As expected, all the major Republican candidates have backed the appeals court's decision. However, top Democrats also seem to share the individual-rights view. "It's important to me to show respect for the Second Amendment, to protect hunters' Second Amendment rights," Mr. Edwards said yesterday, according to Radio Iowa.
"I'm a strong believer in the rights of hunters and sportsmen to have firearms," Senator Obama of Illinois told the same outlet in April.
A statement Senator Clinton released recently stopped just short of endorsing a constitutionally guaranteed, individual right to a firearm. "I support the Second Amendment. Law-abiding citizens should be able to own guns," she told the Des Moines Register.
Josh Gerstein
New York Sun
A new attempt by a Democratic presidential hopeful, John Edwards, to cozy up to hunters is coming under fire from the National Rifle Association and conservation groups.
Traveling in Iowa yesterday, Mr. Edwards unveiled a "Hunting and Fishing Bill of Rights and Responsibilities" that calls for giving hunters more access to federal lands, including, in some cases, national parks.
"This is part of who I am and part of what I will stand for as president," Mr. Edwards told voters in Glenwood, Iowa, according to the Associated Press. He said he hunted while growing up in rural North Carolina and still fishes occasionally.
In a conference call with reporters, the former senator said the federal government could save millions of dollars by having private citizens thin wild herds instead of government-paid sharpshooters. "When national parks need to cull their game species because of overpopulation, I think they should look into having local hunters do the job," Mr. Edwards said, according to Radio Iowa. He also called for limits on oil drilling and logging on federal land, as well as a new national program to pay private landowners to open their property to sportsmen.
Asked for his opinion of the former senator's plan, the NRA's chief lobbyist, Chris Cox, replied: "Pathetic."
Mr. Cox said Mr. Edwards voted during his single Senate term for a measure to impose background checks at gun shows, for a ban on so-called assault weapons, and against a bill to protect gun makers from lawsuits. "Words on the campaign trail don't erase votes on the Senate floor. ... He's been on the wrong side at every opportunity," the lobbyist told The New York Sun.
Environmental groups said they supported parts of Mr. Edwards's plan but were concerned about language that seemed intended to give more weight to hunting interests in debates over land use.
"There are certainly some alarming aspects," the president of the Humane Society Legislative Fund, Michael Markarian, said. "National parks have historically been closed to sport hunting, and we believe that's a policy that should remain in place. … These are not national playgrounds. They're national parks."
The executive director of Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility, Jeff Ruch, called Mr. Edwards's plan "light years away" from the Bush administration's policies on some of the issues, but he said he was concerned that Mr. Edwards's plan would promote more use of snowmobiles and other off-road vehicles. "That's troublesome for a whole variety of reasons, including impact on wildlife," Mr. Ruch said. Mr. Ruch said there were similarities between Mr. Edwards's plan and an executive order Mr. Bush issued in August to promote hunting on federal lands. "What's similar … is the assumption that wildlife is there to provide hunting opportunities," Mr. Ruch said. "You're basically encouraging the propagation of trophy breeds at the expense of breeds that don't look as good on the wall."
While Republican presidential candidates have been actively jockeying for the votes of gun owners, the Democratic field has been all but silent on the issue, heeding the advice of political strategists who contend that persistent talk of gun control has hurt Democrats in recent elections. Until yesterday, only one Democrat, Governor Richardson of New Mexico, had sought to publicize his views on gun issues. Mr. Richardson has released photographs of trophies from his own hunts and has boasted about expanding hunting opportunities in New Mexico.
Candidates have been weighing in, deliberately or not, on a looming legal battle over the meaning of the constitutional right to bear arms. In March, a federal appeals court panel struck down a District of Columbia ban on handguns. The conservative court panel ruled, 2–1, that the Second Amendment creates an individual right to firearms, not merely the right to organize a militia.
The District of Columbia government has asked the Supreme Court to overturn that ruling.
As expected, all the major Republican candidates have backed the appeals court's decision. However, top Democrats also seem to share the individual-rights view. "It's important to me to show respect for the Second Amendment, to protect hunters' Second Amendment rights," Mr. Edwards said yesterday, according to Radio Iowa.
"I'm a strong believer in the rights of hunters and sportsmen to have firearms," Senator Obama of Illinois told the same outlet in April.
A statement Senator Clinton released recently stopped just short of endorsing a constitutionally guaranteed, individual right to a firearm. "I support the Second Amendment. Law-abiding citizens should be able to own guns," she told the Des Moines Register.
Josh Gerstein
New York Sun
